New Beijing Stock Exchange is a long-term plan to boost SMEs

The establishment of the new Beijing Stock Exchange (BJSE) on 3rd September attracted much domestic and global attention. While many market participants find it surprising, it is actually a natural and logical step in Chinese policymakers’ long-term plan. History and current circumstances tell us the necessity for a new exchange in promoting innovation and development of technology-driven small and medium enterprises (SMEs). There is also a reason for locating it in Beijing.

Why A New Exchange?

China mainland is already home to the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, so why the need to set up a new exchange?

Historically, private SMEs in China have minimal access to the financial market. While China has a high savings and investment rate, most savings and investments go to the real estate sector or big companies. With inadequate collateral and low short-term profits, such SMEs find it hard to directly borrow from banks or go public to sell their equities in the stock market.

Without the timely finance, some SMEs had to close. Some others received money from the shadow banking system, but had to grapple with sky-high interest rates. A third group of SMEs, including Alibaba and Tencent when they just started out, were lucky enough to be funded by venture capital funds (VCs). These usually have better chances to grow and succeed than others.

However, in the early years, most VCs were foreign investors, subject to various restrictions in China’s domestic capital market. As a result, after turning profitable, the SMEs had to go public in the United States’ or Hong Kong’s stock exchanges to circumvent capital control so that foreign investors could reap the capital gains.

The Chinese government sought to relax the severe financial constraints on SMEs in a long-term effort. In December 2003, the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and the Municipal Government of Beijing proposed a trial to the State Council of China, which was approved in October 2005. This trial would allow the private companies in Zhongguancun Science Park (commonly known as Z-Park) to trade their equities via agreement-based transfers outside of the two existing stock exchanges.

In January 2006, the trial started, listing two companies from the Z-Park. Later, this trial included more SMEs from different cities and gradually extended to the whole country.

In January 2013, the National Equities Exchange and Quotations (NEEQ), commonly called the New Third Board (NTB), was inaugurated and recognised as the third national equity trading venue after Shanghai and Shenzhen. During 2018 and 2019, a series of new mechanisms were proposed, including establishing the Selection Layer to include the most successful firms and making it possible for firms to transfer to another stock exchange for public listing. This culminated in the birth of the BJSE on 3rd September.

From BJSE’s listing requirements, one can tell that the Chinese government is aiming to boost the growth of SMEs, especially the technology-driven SMEs.

Generally, it is hard for technology-driven SMEs to list in China, due to the requirements on the firm’s size and consistent high profitability. These requirements are sometimes viewed as even more stringent than those of the NASDAQ in the US. In light of that, the Selection Layer of NTB eased some of these requirements. In particular, one special set of optional requirements in the Selection Layer allows SMEs which can show their innovation through research and development expenses or intensities, to face lower requirements in aspects such as size and profitability. This special feature in the Selection Layer is continued in BJSE’s current listing requirements. Together, these special requirements indicate the policymakers’ determination to foster innovation in SMEs.

Nowadays, China needs to foster the growth of SMEs even more because of the following reasons. First, SMEs in China comprised more than 90 per cent of the private enterprises, offered more than 80 per cent of the urban employment, generated more than 70 per cent of technological innovation, accounted for more than 60 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and contributed more than 50 per cent of the national tax income in a 2018 survey.  Second, because of the China-US trade war, China feels the pressure to establish a complete production chain, which necessitates the growth of various SMEs. Third, the Chinese government wants to tunnel the significant savings and investments away from real estate. Providing a third exchange and thus a larger stock market will help in this tunneling effort.

Why Beijing?

Looking at the historical development of the new stock exchange, we can quickly notice Beijing’s involvement in the new exchange and its parent, NTB. NTB originated from a trial implemented by Beijing, and the first group of companies listed there was from the Z-Park. In fact, the earliest name of NTB in Chinese contained the full name of the Z-Park.

Perhaps paradoxically, the government had tried to underplay Beijing’s role in the new exchange. After the NTB trial was extended to the whole country, some local media proposed to call it the Beijing Exchange. But Beijing chose to underplay this name. The primary consideration was that Beijing has already been China’s political and cultural centre; it wanted to avoid competing with Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hong Kong for the position of the financial centre.

This consideration became less relevant nowadays due to the rapidly widening economic gap between the north and the south regions. In the early 1990s, the north-south economic imbalance is not so significant. For example, the top 10 Chinese cities with the highest GDP in 1991 comprised six cities in the south and four cities in the north. It was not such a big deal to have two stock exchanges located in the south during those years.

However, in recent years, the narrative of a “strong south, weak north” China became common. In fact, in 2020, Beijing was the only northern city in the top 10 cities in terms of GDP. Therefore, the Chinese central government feels the urge to boost the financial powers of the north by establishing the new BJSE. The government envisions that the new exchange will enhance the economic growth in the Jingjinji Metropolitan Region (Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei) and the entire northern region of China.

To sum up, BJSE’s establishment is a consistent move in the Chinese government’s long-term plan to boost the growth and innovation of SMEs. At the same time, it serves as a crucial attempt to narrow the north-south economic imbalance in China.